[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180305200927.rdn35ktxxsnx2hu2@sasha-lappy>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 20:09:29 +0000
From: Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.9 111/219] ASoc: rt5645: Add OF device ID
table
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:42:03AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 10:29:00PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 9ba2da5f5d18daaa365ab5426b05e16f1d114786 ]
>>
>> The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices
>> are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a
>> I2C device registered via OF will always match a legacy I2C device ID and
>> that the MODALIAS reported will always be of the form i2c:<device>.
>>
>> But this could change in the future so the correct approach is to have an
>> OF device ID table if the devices are registered via OF.
>
>As the commit message itself says this is not fixing anything, it's
>defence against future changes.
I was under the impression that this refers to future HW changes rather
than code, I'll drop all 3. Thanks!
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists