lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+sD=Hj+3cYy0injRSZ5Dj2M6c+KbiFrrwsO_9pqq8wKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Mar 2018 14:26:17 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc:     Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] of: add early boot allocation of
 of_find_node_by_phandle() cache

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 6:14 PM,  <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
>
> The initial implementation of the of_find_node_by_phandle() cache
> allocates the cache using kcalloc().  Add an early boot allocation
> of the cache so it will be usable during early boot.  Switch over
> to the kcalloc() based cache once normal memory allocation
> becomes available.

Do we get a lot of lookups early? It makes sense to me to do early,
but freeing and repopulating seems to add needless complexity.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ