[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE=gft59Jkb+X0fOcdEZN_8moUPvptZ-xuQaX1mg-VxBzHrSXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 12:44:28 -0800
From: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
To: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] drivers: qcom: rpmh: cache sleep/wake state requests
Hi Lina,
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Active state requests are sent immediately to the mailbox controller,
> while sleep and wake state requests are cached in this driver to avoid
> taxing the mailbox controller repeatedly. The cached values will be sent
> to the controller when the rpmh_flush() is called.
>
> Generally, flushing is a system PM activity and may be called from the
> system PM drivers when the system is entering suspend or deeper sleep
> modes during cpuidle.
>
> Also allow invalidating the cached requests, so they may be re-populated
> again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Remove locking for flush function
> - Improve comments
> ---
> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c | 208 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h | 10 +++
> 2 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
> index d95ea3fa8b67..8a04009075b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
[...]
> +
> +/**
> + * rpmh_invalidate: Invalidate all sleep and active sets
> + * sets.
> + *
> + * @rc: The RPMh handle got from rpmh_get_dev_channel
> + *
> + * Invalidate the sleep and active values in the TCS blocks.
> + */
> +int rpmh_invalidate(struct rpmh_client *rc)
> +{
> + struct rpmh_ctrlr *rpm = rc->ctrlr;
> + int ret;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rc))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&rpm->lock, flags);
> + rpm->dirty = true;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rpm->lock, flags);
Thanks for removing the locking from the flush path. I was hoping to
see the locking removed around this statement as well. The way I
understand it, all of the racy bits are attempting to set dirty to
true, so you don't need a lock to protect multiple threads from
setting the same value. The only time dirty is read or cleared is in
the single-threaded PM path, so there are no potentially dangerous
interactions.
If no one has any other comments on the series, then I don't need to
hold everything up based on this one tweak alone. But if you end up
spinning it again for other reasons, consider making this change as
well.
Thanks,
-Evan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists