linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7] x86/microcode: Do not upload microcode if CPUs are offline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <236a3244-c4df-0d40-72c0-583ca9f47fd6@amd.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Mar 2018 16:06:48 -0600
From:   Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Cc:     Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] x86/microcode: Do not upload microcode if CPUs are
 offline

On 2/28/2018 4:28 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
> 
> Avoid loading microcode if any of the CPUs are offline, and issue a
> warning. Having different microcode revisions on the system at any time
> is outright dangerous.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
> Cc: x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-4-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com
> [ Massage it. ]
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 

Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> index 63370651e376..fa32cb3dcca5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> @@ -486,6 +486,16 @@ static void __exit microcode_dev_exit(void)
>  /* fake device for request_firmware */
>  static struct platform_device	*microcode_pdev;
>  
> +static int check_online_cpus(void)
> +{
> +	if (num_online_cpus() == num_present_cpus())
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	pr_err("Not all CPUs online, aborting microcode update.\n");
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
>  static enum ucode_state reload_for_cpu(int cpu)
>  {
>  	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
> @@ -519,7 +529,13 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev,
>  		return size;
>  
>  	get_online_cpus();
> +
> +	ret = check_online_cpus();
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto put;
> +
>  	mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex);
> +
>  	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>  		tmp_ret = reload_for_cpu(cpu);
>  		if (tmp_ret > UCODE_NFOUND) {
> @@ -538,6 +554,8 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev,
>  		microcode_check();
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex);
> +
> +put:
>  	put_online_cpus();
>  
>  	if (!ret)
>