[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B9422F24F@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 11:34:50 +0000
From: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
CC: "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] tmp: factor out tpm1_get_random into tpm1-cmd.c
>
> On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 11:30 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > Factor out get random implementation from tpm-interface.c into
> > tpm1_get_random function in tpm1-cmd.c.
> > No functional changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
>
> While you are doing this, please make it use tpm_buf so tha we get stuff out
> of that nasty union. Using "helper" structs is still fine, just move it right
> before the function implementation out of tpm.h (there are examples of this
> tpm2-cmd.c).
Sure, but not while moving code, this is dangerous. Should be done after code is moved.
Thanks
Tomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists