[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf6sYss8q5FjgLYaQXYN761M4awmLVjZ48Cdd8+NrrhxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 13:57:50 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ntb@...glegroups.com,
linux-crypto <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>,
Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 7/7] ntb: ntb_hw_switchtec: Cleanup 64bit IO defines
to use the common header
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:08 PM, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> wrote:
>> > Clean up the ifdefs which conditionally defined the io{read|write}64
>> > functions in favour of the new common io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi header.
>>
>> > #include <linux/kthread.h>
>> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> > #include <linux/ntb.h>
>> > +#include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
>>
>> A nit, can we preserve alphabetical ordering?
>
> Ugh, why, it doesn't matter at all :)
I'm fine with either way, but ordering is a good thing to have in long
term prospective.
Easy to find what headers are in there, easy to understand if you need
another one or not, easy to maintain the list w/o duplications.
I saw already few examples where long list of headers contained
duplications b/c it was in messy order.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists