linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH Resent] perf annotate: Fix s390 target function disassembly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180306140449.GD10176@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 6 Mar 2018 11:04:49 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resent] perf annotate: Fix s390 target function
 disassembly

Em Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 01:39:55PM +0100, Thomas Richter escreveu:
> Perf annotate displays function call assembler instructions
> with a right arrow. Hitting enter on this line/instruction
> causes the browser to disassemble this target function and
> show it on the screen.  On s390 this results in an error
> message 'The called function was not found.'
> 
> The function call assembly line parsing does not handle
> the s390 bras and brasl instructions. Function call__parse
> expects the target as first operand:
> 	callq	e9140 <__fxstat>
> S390 has a register number as first operand:
> 	brasl	%r14,41d60 <abort>
> Therefore the target addresses on s390 are always zero
> which is an invalid address.
> 
> Fix this by skipping the first operand on s390.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> index 49ff825f745c..feb6006b676d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> @@ -192,6 +192,14 @@ static int call__parse(struct arch *arch, struct ins_operands *ops, struct map *
>  	};
>  
>  	ops->target.addr = strtoull(ops->raw, &endptr, 16);
> +	if (!strcmp(arch->name, "s390")) {
> +		/* s390 function call 1st operand is register */
> +		tok = strchr(ops->raw, ',');
> +		if (tok)
> +			ops->target.addr = strtoull(tok + 1, &endptr, 16);
> +		else
> +			ops->target.addr = 0;
> +	} else
> +		ops->target.addr = strtoull(ops->raw, &endptr, 16);

Do we have to do this here? Can't we have a s390_call__parse() and set
that in the s/390 instructions?

We should avoid arch specific stuff in the common code, and we could
even have a call_reg__parse() perhaps? One that knows that the first
operand is a reg and it should _always_ skip te first one, be it on
s/390 or elsewhere?

- Arnaldo
  
>  	name = strchr(endptr, '<');
>  	if (name == NULL)
> -- 
> 2.14.3