[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae4c741e-d5aa-4a8c-4029-1dff6bef2cdd@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 14:09:17 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: ehci: add optional external vbus
supply property
On 06/03/18 01:57, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:51:38AM +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>> On some boards, especially when vbus supply requires large current,
>> and the charge pump on the PHY isn't enough, an external vbus power switch
>> per port may be used.
>> Add portN_vbus-supply property to usb-ehci bindings. As the number of ports
>> depends on the ehci controller, and the port on which an external vbus
>> supply depends on the platform, <portN> is used to make it generic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ehci.txt | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ehci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ehci.txt
>> index 3efde12..cd576db 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ehci.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ehci.txt
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ Optional properties:
>> - phys : phandle + phy specifier pair
>> - phy-names : "usb"
>> - resets : phandle + reset specifier pair
>> + - portN_vbus-supply : phandle of regulator supplying vbus for port N
>
> Just make this an array with the index being the port (and drop
> "portN_").
Does that still work if there is an external supply for port 1 but none
for port 0? I believe that was brought up as a possibility before.
Robin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists