[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180306143939.GA23766@u40b0340c692b58f6553c.ant.amazon.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 06:39:39 -0800
From: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] KVM: Introduce dedicated vCPUs hint
KVM_HINTS_DEDICATED
Folks,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 09:05:39AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> This patchset introduces dedicated vCPUs(vCPU pinning, and there is no
> vCPU over-commitment) hint KVM_HINTS_DEDICATED, it has two users now:
>
> 1) Waiman Long mentioned that:
>
> Generally speaking, unfair lock performs well for VMs with a small
> number of vCPUs. Native qspinlock may perform better than pvqspinlock
> if there is vCPU pinning and there is no vCPU over-commitment.
>
> 2) vCPUs are very unlikely to get preempted when they are the only task
> running on a CPU. PV TLB flush is slower that the native flush in that
> case.
>
> v3 -> v4:
> * update feature bit document
> v2 -> v3:
> * a separate table for CPUID[0x40000001].EDX bits
> * a new kvm_hint_has_feature macro
> v1 -> v2:
> * update to KVM_HINTS_DEDICATED
Great to see this has finally moved forward! Thanks for picking it up Wanpeng.
I would just request to next time at least reference the original thread and
copy the original authors of the patch/idea.
Thanks a lot.
--
All the best,
Eduardo Valentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists