[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180306151004.31336-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 16:10:04 +0100
From: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] selftest: net: reuseport_bpf_numa: don't fail if no numa support
The reuseport_bpf_numa test case fails there's no numa support. The
test shouldn't fail if there's no support it should be skipped with a
pass.
Fixes: 3c2c3c16aaf6 ("reuseport, bpf: add test case for bpf_get_numa_node_id")
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
index 365c32e84189..9245c14165b7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
@@ -228,8 +228,10 @@ int main(void)
{
int *rcv_fd, nodes;
- if (numa_available() < 0)
- error(1, errno, "no numa api support");
+ if (numa_available() < 0) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "no numa api support");
+ return 0;
+ }
nodes = numa_max_node() + 1;
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists