linux-kernel - Re: Regression in IPMI on 4.15.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Mar 2018 11:19:47 -0600
From:   Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
To:     Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc:     openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in IPMI on 4.15.6

On 03/06/2018 11:17 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 03/05/2018 11:39 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>> On 03/05/2018 01:31 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>> On 03/05/2018 01:07 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>>> On 03/02/2018 05:46 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>>>> On 02/28/2018 01:07 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>>>>> On 02/28/2018 08:17 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>>>>>> On 02/28/2018 07:53 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 02/27/2018 05:55 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fedora got a bug report of a crash in IPMI on 4.15.6
>>>>>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549316
>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, it's only a screenshot but it's fairly
>>>>>>>>> clear. It looks like a panic in the error handling path
>>>>>>>>> in platform_device_unregister. Any ideas?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You may also run into another issue.  You can pull the
>>>>>>> individual patch at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/cminyard/linux-ipmi.git 
>>>>>>> c8a1972e77dbe321ce5ce0247056e727234cbaec
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, it needed a few more tweaks.  Can you do change
>>>>>> 426fa6179dae677134dfb37b21d057819418515b
>>>>>> instead?  It's "ipmi: Fix some error cleanup issues"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can send you patches, if you like.  If you could test and get back
>>>>>> to me, that would be great.
>>>>>
>>>>> Laura, have you had a chance to test this?  I'd like to get it in 
>>>>> soon,
>>>>> if possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> -corey
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think "ipmi: Re-use existing macros for built-in properties" is 
>>>> broken:
>>>>
>>>
>>> That particular requires some new stuff.  I was just wanting you to 
>>> pull that individual patch,
>>> not the whole branch.  I can just send the two patches, if you like.
>>
>> Or, I just pulled in 4.15.6 and cherry picked those two patches to:
>>
>> https://github.com/cminyard/linux-ipmi.git fix-pdev-unreg
>>
>> Hopefully that makes things easier.
>>
>> -corey
>>
>
> Yes, the reporter said it worked fine.
>

It would be helpful to me to have a "Tested-by" line.  Can I put one in?
If so, whose name/email do I use?

Thanks for testing.

-corey

> Thanks,
> Laura