[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4iR-AMOK0wphTm4cPxypjv_z=qwPJvKs__1md1qbPvJOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 11:13:33 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] nfit_test: improve structure offset handling
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Ross Zwisler
<ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:29:50AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>> In nfit_test0_setup() and nfit_test1_setup() we keep an 'offset' value
>> which we use to calculate where in our 'nfit_buf' we will place our next
>> structure. The handling of 'offset' and the calculation of the placement
>> of the next structure is a bit inconsistent, though. We don't update
>> 'offset' after we insert each structure, sometimes causing us to update it
>> for multiple structures' sizes at once. When calculating the position of
>> the next structure we aren't always able to just use 'offset', but
>> sometimes have to add in other structure sizes as well.
>>
>> Fix this by updating 'offset' after each structure insertion in a
>> consistent way, allowing us to always calculate the position of the next
>> structure to be inserted by just using 'nfit_buf + offset'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Ping on this series.
All of these look good to me, applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists