linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the pinctrl tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdaWd_7QWd7t5i6DvU3_Gu1giR9v2uoqQiLNXVWTPEty8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Mar 2018 23:25:48 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the pinctrl tree

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Linus,
>
> Commit
>
>   fc08fa6009a0 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7795: remove duplicate of CLKOUT pin in pinmux_pins[]")
>
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

Looping in Geert,

I guess this came in through the Renesas PFC pull request.

Geert do you prefer that I back it all out so you can send me
a new pull request? Or some other solution?

Yours,
Linus Walleij