[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180307144805.224a39e2ab72172f40c3f3d2@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 14:48:05 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] sysctl: Enable easy addition of range showing
sysctl parameters
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 15:34:24 -0500 Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
> This patch series is to be applied on top of the patch
> series "ipc: Clamp *mni to the real IPCMNI limit"
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/1/716).
>
> The purpose of this patch series is to enable easy addition of new
> auxillary sysctl parameters that can be read to display ranges of
> other sysctl parameters they are associated with.
>
> With this patch series applied, a developer can add a range-showing
> auxillary sysctl entries by just setting the CTL_FLAGS_SHOW_RANGE
> flag in the ctl_table entry that has a range to show and add one more
> to the number of reserved range entries in the CTL_RESERVE_RANGES()
> macro before the terminating null entry. The new auxillary sysctl
> parameters will have the "_range" suffix added.
>
> The number of ctl_table entries that have the CTL_FLAGS_SHOW_RANGE flag
> should match the number of reserved entries in the CTL_RESERVE_RANGES()
> macro. Otherwise, warning or error like below will be logged in the
> kernel ring buffer.
>
> Warning: Too many reserved ctl_table range entries ("shmmax")!
>
> Error: Insufficient reserved ctl_table range entries ("shmmax")!
>
> The IPC sysctl parameters msgmni and shmmni are extended to have
> those auxillary sysctl entries. As a result, one can now find out
> the range of allowable value by looking at the corresponding
> auxillary _range sysctl parameters. For example,
>
> % cat msgmni_range
> [0, 32768]
>
> That means the msgmni sysctl parameter has to be within the 0 - 32768
> range inclusively.
>
> ...
>
> fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> include/linux/sysctl.h | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> ipc/ipc_sysctl.c | 5 ++-
> kernel/sysctl.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
That quite a bunch of new code and it's not clear to me that we get a
lot of value from it all. Perhaps I'm missing the point.
A worked example would help, along the lines of:
a) Here's how we do X at present and here's the output
b) Here's how we X after these patches and here's the new output
c) b) is better than a) for <reasons>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists