lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJofYYFiKEbNsU+g11x38JFsPg30AHJbH3hArAgr3PBVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Mar 2018 15:56:50 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsprintf: Remove accidental VLA usage

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 15:07:14 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
>> The "sym" calculation is actually a fixed size, but since the max()
>> macro uses some extensive tricks for safety, it ends up looking like a
>> variable size. This replaces max() with a simple max macro which is
>> sufficient for the calculation of the array size.
>>
>> Seen with -Wvla. Fixed as part of the directive to remove all VLAs from
>> the kernel: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
>> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
>> @@ -744,8 +744,9 @@ char *resource_string(char *buf, char *end, struct resource *res,
>>  #define FLAG_BUF_SIZE                (2 * sizeof(res->flags))
>>  #define DECODED_BUF_SIZE     sizeof("[mem - 64bit pref window disabled]")
>>  #define RAW_BUF_SIZE         sizeof("[mem - flags 0x]")
>> -     char sym[max(2*RSRC_BUF_SIZE + DECODED_BUF_SIZE,
>> -                  2*RSRC_BUF_SIZE + FLAG_BUF_SIZE + RAW_BUF_SIZE)];
>> +#define SIMPLE_MAX(x, y)     ((x) > (y) ? (x) : (y))
>> +     char sym[SIMPLE_MAX(2*RSRC_BUF_SIZE + DECODED_BUF_SIZE,
>> +                         2*RSRC_BUF_SIZE + FLAG_BUF_SIZE + RAW_BUF_SIZE)];
>>
>>       char *p = sym, *pend = sym + sizeof(sym);
>>       int decode = (fmt[0] == 'R') ? 1 : 0;
>
> A year from now I'll be receiving an email titled
>
>         [patch] lib/vsprintf.c: use standard max() macro
>
> won't I?

Hopefully a year from now we'll have added -Wvla to the global build
flags and no one will be able to try that. :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ