[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180307104741.mdy2wa7hplfwxmb3@mwanda>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 13:47:41 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: rtl8192u: Replace printk() with more
standardize output format.
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 04:09:09PM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> @@ -276,22 +276,22 @@ static int ieee80211_ccmp_decrypt(struct sk_buff *skb, int hdr_len, void *priv)
> keyidx = pos[3];
> if (!(keyidx & (1 << 5))) {
> if (net_ratelimit()) {
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "CCMP: received packet without ExtIV flag from %pM\n",
> - hdr->addr2);
> + netdev_dbg(skb->dev, "CCMP: received packet without ExtIV flag from %pM\n",
> + hdr->addr2);
> }
I'm sorry. I really hate to do this to you... But the right thing here
is to use net_dbg_ratelimited() but get rid of the if (net_ratelimit())
check. So it looks like this:
if (!(keyidx & (1 << 5))) {
net_dbg_ratelimited(skb->dev,
"CCMP: received packet without ExtIV flag from %pM\n",
hdr->addr2);
}
Sorry again, when I looked at it before I just replied what my fast
thinking lizard brain said instead of taking time to look at what I was
saying.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists