[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180307234142.1c7d2710@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 23:41:42 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dump_stack: convert generic dump_stack into a weak
symbol
Hi Sergey,
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 20:48:56 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On (03/07/18 11:57), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> [..]
> > >> Originally I planned to wait a few more releases, but the last maintainer
> > >> has commented that he will now send a patch for immediate removal,
> > >> so 4.17 is almost certain at this point.
> > >
> > > Would be great to get it removed as soon as possible then. Otherwise we
> > > will get broken blackfin build errors from Stephen (or would need to hold
> > > off Dave's patch).
> >
> > You could also add a patch to your tree that removes the blackfin
> > dump_stack() function, or we could ask Stephen and the other
> > people operating build bots to stop building blackfin right now
> > (they will have to do that anyway once the arch gets removed).
>
> OK. Petr, Stephen, what would be your preference?
I can easily stop building blackfin - and, if the intention is to
remove it, there is not much point in wasting resources building it any
anyway.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists