| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1520431349-30689-2-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 16:02:21 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] perf intel-pt: Fix overlap detection to identify consecutive buffers correctly
Overlap detection was not not updating the buffer's 'consecutive' flag.
Marking buffers consecutive has the advantage that decoding begins from the
start of the buffer instead of the first PSB. Fix overlap detection to
identify consecutive buffers correctly.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
---
.../perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c | 62 ++++++++++------------
.../perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.h | 2 +-
tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c | 5 +-
3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
index aa1593ce551d..00f25f4b5f48 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
@@ -2390,14 +2390,6 @@ const struct intel_pt_state *intel_pt_decode(struct intel_pt_decoder *decoder)
return &decoder->state;
}
-static bool intel_pt_at_psb(unsigned char *buf, size_t len)
-{
- if (len < INTEL_PT_PSB_LEN)
- return false;
- return memmem(buf, INTEL_PT_PSB_LEN, INTEL_PT_PSB_STR,
- INTEL_PT_PSB_LEN);
-}
-
/**
* intel_pt_next_psb - move buffer pointer to the start of the next PSB packet.
* @buf: pointer to buffer pointer
@@ -2486,6 +2478,7 @@ static unsigned char *intel_pt_last_psb(unsigned char *buf, size_t len)
* @buf: buffer
* @len: size of buffer
* @tsc: TSC value returned
+ * @rem: returns remaining size when TSC is found
*
* Find a TSC packet in @buf and return the TSC value. This function assumes
* that @buf starts at a PSB and that PSB+ will contain TSC and so stops if a
@@ -2493,7 +2486,8 @@ static unsigned char *intel_pt_last_psb(unsigned char *buf, size_t len)
*
* Return: %true if TSC is found, false otherwise.
*/
-static bool intel_pt_next_tsc(unsigned char *buf, size_t len, uint64_t *tsc)
+static bool intel_pt_next_tsc(unsigned char *buf, size_t len, uint64_t *tsc,
+ size_t *rem)
{
struct intel_pt_pkt packet;
int ret;
@@ -2504,6 +2498,7 @@ static bool intel_pt_next_tsc(unsigned char *buf, size_t len, uint64_t *tsc)
return false;
if (packet.type == INTEL_PT_TSC) {
*tsc = packet.payload;
+ *rem = len;
return true;
}
if (packet.type == INTEL_PT_PSBEND)
@@ -2554,6 +2549,8 @@ static int intel_pt_tsc_cmp(uint64_t tsc1, uint64_t tsc2)
* @len_a: size of first buffer
* @buf_b: second buffer
* @len_b: size of second buffer
+ * @consecutive: returns true if there is data in buf_b that is consecutive
+ * to buf_a
*
* If the trace contains TSC we can look at the last TSC of @buf_a and the
* first TSC of @buf_b in order to determine if the buffers overlap, and then
@@ -2566,33 +2563,41 @@ static int intel_pt_tsc_cmp(uint64_t tsc1, uint64_t tsc2)
static unsigned char *intel_pt_find_overlap_tsc(unsigned char *buf_a,
size_t len_a,
unsigned char *buf_b,
- size_t len_b)
+ size_t len_b, bool *consecutive)
{
uint64_t tsc_a, tsc_b;
unsigned char *p;
- size_t len;
+ size_t len, rem_a, rem_b;
p = intel_pt_last_psb(buf_a, len_a);
if (!p)
return buf_b; /* No PSB in buf_a => no overlap */
len = len_a - (p - buf_a);
- if (!intel_pt_next_tsc(p, len, &tsc_a)) {
+ if (!intel_pt_next_tsc(p, len, &tsc_a, &rem_a)) {
/* The last PSB+ in buf_a is incomplete, so go back one more */
len_a -= len;
p = intel_pt_last_psb(buf_a, len_a);
if (!p)
return buf_b; /* No full PSB+ => assume no overlap */
len = len_a - (p - buf_a);
- if (!intel_pt_next_tsc(p, len, &tsc_a))
+ if (!intel_pt_next_tsc(p, len, &tsc_a, &rem_a))
return buf_b; /* No TSC in buf_a => assume no overlap */
}
while (1) {
/* Ignore PSB+ with no TSC */
- if (intel_pt_next_tsc(buf_b, len_b, &tsc_b) &&
- intel_pt_tsc_cmp(tsc_a, tsc_b) < 0)
- return buf_b; /* tsc_a < tsc_b => no overlap */
+ if (intel_pt_next_tsc(buf_b, len_b, &tsc_b, &rem_b)) {
+ int cmp = intel_pt_tsc_cmp(tsc_a, tsc_b);
+
+ /* Same TSC, so buffers are consecutive */
+ if (!cmp && rem_b >= rem_a) {
+ *consecutive = true;
+ return buf_b + len_b - (rem_b - rem_a);
+ }
+ if (cmp < 0)
+ return buf_b; /* tsc_a < tsc_b => no overlap */
+ }
if (!intel_pt_step_psb(&buf_b, &len_b))
return buf_b + len_b; /* No PSB in buf_b => no data */
@@ -2606,6 +2611,8 @@ static unsigned char *intel_pt_find_overlap_tsc(unsigned char *buf_a,
* @buf_b: second buffer
* @len_b: size of second buffer
* @have_tsc: can use TSC packets to detect overlap
+ * @consecutive: returns true if there is data in buf_b that is consecutive
+ * to buf_a
*
* When trace samples or snapshots are recorded there is the possibility that
* the data overlaps. Note that, for the purposes of decoding, data is only
@@ -2616,7 +2623,7 @@ static unsigned char *intel_pt_find_overlap_tsc(unsigned char *buf_a,
*/
unsigned char *intel_pt_find_overlap(unsigned char *buf_a, size_t len_a,
unsigned char *buf_b, size_t len_b,
- bool have_tsc)
+ bool have_tsc, bool *consecutive)
{
unsigned char *found;
@@ -2628,7 +2635,8 @@ unsigned char *intel_pt_find_overlap(unsigned char *buf_a, size_t len_a,
return buf_b; /* No overlap */
if (have_tsc) {
- found = intel_pt_find_overlap_tsc(buf_a, len_a, buf_b, len_b);
+ found = intel_pt_find_overlap_tsc(buf_a, len_a, buf_b, len_b,
+ consecutive);
if (found)
return found;
}
@@ -2643,28 +2651,16 @@ unsigned char *intel_pt_find_overlap(unsigned char *buf_a, size_t len_a,
}
/* Now len_b >= len_a */
- if (len_b > len_a) {
- /* The leftover buffer 'b' must start at a PSB */
- while (!intel_pt_at_psb(buf_b + len_a, len_b - len_a)) {
- if (!intel_pt_step_psb(&buf_a, &len_a))
- return buf_b; /* No overlap */
- }
- }
-
while (1) {
/* Potential overlap so check the bytes */
found = memmem(buf_a, len_a, buf_b, len_a);
- if (found)
+ if (found) {
+ *consecutive = true;
return buf_b + len_a;
+ }
/* Try again at next PSB in buffer 'a' */
if (!intel_pt_step_psb(&buf_a, &len_a))
return buf_b; /* No overlap */
-
- /* The leftover buffer 'b' must start at a PSB */
- while (!intel_pt_at_psb(buf_b + len_a, len_b - len_a)) {
- if (!intel_pt_step_psb(&buf_a, &len_a))
- return buf_b; /* No overlap */
- }
}
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.h b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.h
index 921b22e8ca0e..fc1752d50019 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.h
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ struct intel_pt_params {
unsigned char *intel_pt_find_overlap(unsigned char *buf_a, size_t len_a,
unsigned char *buf_b, size_t len_b,
- bool have_tsc);
+ bool have_tsc, bool *consecutive);
int intel_pt__strerror(int code, char *buf, size_t buflen);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
index 3773d9c54f45..4a7746249999 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
@@ -207,14 +207,17 @@ static void intel_pt_dump_event(struct intel_pt *pt, unsigned char *buf,
static int intel_pt_do_fix_overlap(struct intel_pt *pt, struct auxtrace_buffer *a,
struct auxtrace_buffer *b)
{
+ bool consecutive = false;
void *start;
start = intel_pt_find_overlap(a->data, a->size, b->data, b->size,
- pt->have_tsc);
+ pt->have_tsc, &consecutive);
if (!start)
return -EINVAL;
b->use_size = b->data + b->size - start;
b->use_data = start;
+ if (b->use_size && consecutive)
+ b->consecutive = true;
return 0;
}
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists