linux-kernel - Re: Regulator regression in next-20180305

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180307144505.GH7290@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 7 Mar 2018 14:45:05 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Regulator regression in next-20180305

On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 07:10:01PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:

> Yesterday I spent a few hours trying to understand this locking issue,
> but didn't get any success on this task.

Right, so I'm thinking that if it's taking this much effort to think
about the problem we should just drop the patch set for now.  I've moved
the code to a branch test/coupled in my git so it's not getting in
people's way in -next.  Maciej, I suspect that you might be able to
reproduce this if you set supply names in the regulator definitons for
the PMICs on your boards.  I think that's the difference here.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)