[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37a89c09-e933-9256-1b7a-3a9df846a672@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 16:10:11 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@...zon.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: expose the host's ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR to
userspace
On 07/03/2018 15:56, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> The MSR_F10H_DECFG default is questionable -- MSR_F10H_DECFG is an
> architectural MSR, so we'd be changing the guest under the sight of
> existing userspaces.
> A potential security risk if they migrate the guest to a CPU that
> doesn't serialize LFENCE. ARCH_CAPABILITIES are at least hidden by a
> new CPUID bit.
Good point. Perhaps we should add a KVM-specific CPUID bit for
serializing LFENCE.
> The feature MSR defaults are going to be a mess anyway: we have
> MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV that is tightly coupled with CPUID. Not a good
> candidate for passing by default and currently also has a default value.
Yeah, ucode revision is out of question.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists