[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5288ee8a-179a-8e45-0300-6a3c382a1cf9@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 10:39:58 -0500
From: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
jannh@...gle.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, bcrl@...ck.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, kent.overstreet@...il.com
Cc: security@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com, Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] RDMAVT: Fix synchronization around percpu_ref
On 3/6/2018 12:33 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> rvt_mregion uses percpu_ref for reference counting and RCU to protect
> accesses from lkey_table. When a rvt_mregion needs to be freed, it
> first gets unregistered from lkey_table and then rvt_check_refs() is
> called to wait for in-flight usages before the rvt_mregion is freed.
>
> rvt_check_refs() seems to have a couple issues.
>
> * It has a fast exit path which tests percpu_ref_is_zero(). However,
> a percpu_ref reading zero doesn't mean that the object can be
> released. In fact, the ->release() callback might not even have
> started executing yet. Proceeding with freeing can lead to
> use-after-free.
>
> * lkey_table is RCU protected but there is no RCU grace period in the
> free path. percpu_ref uses RCU internally but it's sched-RCU whose
> grace periods are different from regular RCU. Also, it generally
> isn't a good idea to depend on internal behaviors like this.
>
> To address the above issues, this patch removes the the fast exit and
Typo above too many "the".
> adds an explicit synchronize_rcu().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>
> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>
> Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
> Hello, Dennis, Mike.
>
> I don't know RDMA at all and this patch is only compile tested. Can
> you please take a careful look?
Looks good to me, passes my basic sanity tests. Thanks!
Acked-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists