linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][net-next] net: mvpp2: make function mvpp2_check_hw_buf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180307.132551.1339524852801277076.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 07 Mar 2018 13:25:51 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     colin.king@...onical.com
Cc:     antoine.tenart@...tlin.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][net-next] net: mvpp2: make function
 mvpp2_check_hw_buf_num static

From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Date: Tue,  6 Mar 2018 16:25:17 +0100

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> The function mvpp2_check_hw_buf_num is local to the source and does
> not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
> 
> Cleans up sparse warning:
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2.c:4298:5: warning: symbol
> 'mvpp2_check_hw_buf_num' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

Someone else submitted this already, but thanks for the submission.