linux-kernel - Re: Simplifying our RCU models

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzyycJWD2xuo7wSptJ=D045yiZnmO+7iY6CapDvge_uCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Mar 2018 10:48:50 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Simplifying our RCU models

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:54 AM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Ah, and any thoughts on how best to get feedback from the various people
> who would need to reprogram their fingers?  Or is everyone already on
> board with changing these various names?

I really would prefer to not see massive re-naming unless there is a
really good reason for it.

I'm all for simplifying RCU from a million different versions down to
just a few thousand, but I'm definitely not convinced we want to do
any search-and-replace.

                 Linus