linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 050/110] net/mlx5e: Specify numa node when allocating drop rq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180307191046.119870190@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed,  7 Mar 2018 11:38:33 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Gal Pressman <galp@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 050/110] net/mlx5e: Specify numa node when allocating drop rq

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Gal Pressman <galp@...lanox.com>


[ Upstream commit 2f0db87901698cd73d828cc6fb1957b8916fc911 ]

When allocating a drop rq, no numa node is explicitly set which means
allocations are done on node zero. This is not necessarily the nearest
numa node to the HCA, and even worse, might even be a memoryless numa
node.

Choose the numa_node given to us by the pci device in order to properly
allocate the coherent dma memory instead of assuming zero is valid.

Fixes: 556dd1b9c313 ("net/mlx5e: Set drop RQ's necessary parameters only")
Signed-off-by: Gal Pressman <galp@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c |   10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
@@ -1918,13 +1918,16 @@ static void mlx5e_build_rq_param(struct
 	param->wq.linear = 1;
 }
 
-static void mlx5e_build_drop_rq_param(struct mlx5e_rq_param *param)
+static void mlx5e_build_drop_rq_param(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev,
+				      struct mlx5e_rq_param *param)
 {
 	void *rqc = param->rqc;
 	void *wq = MLX5_ADDR_OF(rqc, rqc, wq);
 
 	MLX5_SET(wq, wq, wq_type, MLX5_WQ_TYPE_LINKED_LIST);
 	MLX5_SET(wq, wq, log_wq_stride,    ilog2(sizeof(struct mlx5e_rx_wqe)));
+
+	param->wq.buf_numa_node = dev_to_node(&mdev->pdev->dev);
 }
 
 static void mlx5e_build_sq_param_common(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
@@ -2778,6 +2781,9 @@ static int mlx5e_alloc_drop_cq(struct ml
 			       struct mlx5e_cq *cq,
 			       struct mlx5e_cq_param *param)
 {
+	param->wq.buf_numa_node = dev_to_node(&mdev->pdev->dev);
+	param->wq.db_numa_node  = dev_to_node(&mdev->pdev->dev);
+
 	return mlx5e_alloc_cq_common(mdev, param, cq);
 }
 
@@ -2789,7 +2795,7 @@ static int mlx5e_open_drop_rq(struct mlx
 	struct mlx5e_cq *cq = &drop_rq->cq;
 	int err;
 
-	mlx5e_build_drop_rq_param(&rq_param);
+	mlx5e_build_drop_rq_param(mdev, &rq_param);
 
 	err = mlx5e_alloc_drop_cq(mdev, cq, &cq_param);
 	if (err)