| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180307200543.scpqbh7rb635b7c3@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 01:35:43 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, afaerber@...e.de,
liuwei@...ions-semi.com, mp-cs@...ions-semi.com,
96boards@...obotics.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
daniel.thompson@...aro.org, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hzhang@...obotics.com,
bdong@...obotics.com, manivannanece23@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] dt-bindings: gpio: Add gpio nodes for Actions
S900 SoC
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the review.
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 01:52:33PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 09:20:40AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Add gpio nodes for Actions Semi S900 SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/actions,owl-gpio.txt | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/actions,owl-gpio.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/actions,owl-gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/actions,owl-gpio.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..d2939ca6cfaf
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/actions,owl-gpio.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
> > +* Actions Semi OWL GPIO controller bindings
> > +
> > +The GPIOs are organized as individual banks/ports with variable number
> > +of GPIOs. Each bank is represented as an individual GPIO controller.
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible : Should be "actions,s900-gpio"
> > +- reg : Address and range of the GPIO controller registers.
> > +- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a GPIO controller.
> > +- #gpio-cells : Should be <2>. The first cell is the gpio number
> > + and the second cell is used to specify optional
> > + parameters.
> > +- interrupt-controller : Marks the device node as an interrupt controller.
> > +- #interrupt-cells : Specifies the number of cells needed to encode an
> > + interrupt. Shall be set to 2. The first cell
> > + defines the interrupt number, the second encodes
> > + the trigger flags described in
> > + bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- gpio-ranges : Mapping between GPIO and pinctrl
> > +
> > +Note: Each GPIO port should have an alias correctly numbered in "aliases"
> > +node.
>
> Why? Please don't use aliases for gpios.
>
Okay.
> > +
> > +Examples:
> > +
> > +aliases {
> > + gpio0 = &gpioa;
> > + gpio1 = &gpiob;
> > + gpio2 = &gpioc;
> > + gpio3 = &gpiod;
> > + gpio4 = &gpioe;
> > + gpio5 = &gpiof;
> > +};
> > +
> > + gpioa: gpioa@...b0000 {
>
> Use generic node names (gpio).
>
Okay. But how about the label? Should it be gpioa... or gpio1...
In datasheet, the registers are named from gpioa to gpiof.
> > + compatible = "actions,s900-gpio";
> > + reg = <0x0 0xe01b0000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + gpio-ranges = <&pinctrl 0 0 32>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpiob: gpiob@...b0000 {
>
> Ah, but your are duplicating addresses here which you shouldn't do
> either. These should be all one node if you can avoid overlapping.
>
Hmmm. Okay. Then I can use the sub address for all nodes. But having a single
node doesn't makes sense here since each bank has its own interrupt
domain and somewhat resembles an individual controller.
Thanks,
Mani
> > + compatible = "actions,s900-gpio";
> > + reg = <0x0 0xe01b0000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + gpio-ranges = <&pinctrl 0 32 32>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpioc: gpioc@...b0000 {
> > + compatible = "actions,s900-gpio";
> > + reg = <0x0 0xe01b0000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + gpio-ranges = <&pinctrl 0 64 12>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpiod: gpiod@...b0000 {
> > + compatible = "actions,s900-gpio";
> > + reg = <0x0 0xe01b0000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + gpio-ranges = <&pinctrl 0 76 30>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpioe: gpioe@...b0000 {
> > + compatible = "actions,s900-gpio";
> > + reg = <0x0 0xe01b0000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + gpio-ranges = <&pinctrl 0 106 32>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpiof: gpiof@...b0000 {
> > + compatible = "actions,s900-gpio";
> > + reg = <0x0 0xe01b0000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + gpio-ranges = <&pinctrl 0 138 8>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + };
> > --
> > 2.14.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists