[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM5PR04MB10857D9F0177C760047100D1FCD80@DM5PR04MB1085.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 06:40:44 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"shawn.lin@...k-chips.com" <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
"andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Vladimir_Zapolskiy@...tor.com" <Vladimir_Zapolskiy@...tor.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6] mmc: Export host capabilities to debugfs.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harish Jenny K N [mailto:harish_kandiga@...tor.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 7:38 AM
> To: ulf.hansson@...aro.org; linus.walleij@...aro.org;
> adrian.hunter@...el.com; shawn.lin@...k-chips.com; Avri Altman
> <Avri.Altman@....com>; andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com
> Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> harish_kandiga@...tor.com; Vladimir_Zapolskiy@...tor.com
> Subject: [PATCH v6] mmc: Export host capabilities to debugfs.
>
> This patch exports the host capabilities to debugfs
>
> This idea of sharing host capabilities over debugfs came up from Abbas Raza
> <Abbas_Raza@...tor.com> Earlier discussions:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/5/357
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg48219.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>
> ---
>
>
> +static int mmc_caps_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused) {
> + struct mmc_host *host = s->private;
> + u32 caps = host->caps;
> +
> + seq_puts(s, "\nMMC Host capabilities are:\n");
> + seq_puts(s,
> "=============================================\n");
> + seq_printf(s, "Can the host do 4 bit transfers :\t%s\n",
> + ((caps & MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA) ? "Yes" : "No"));
Maybe use a more compact form, and just call a macro with the applicable (stringified) bit?
Thanks,
Avri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists