linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: endpoint: BAR width should not depend on sizeof dma_addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180308133331.19464-2-niklas.cassel@axis.com>
Date:   Thu,  8 Mar 2018 14:33:26 +0100
From:   Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...s.com>
To:     kishon@...com, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, John Keeping <john@...anate.com>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Niklas Cassel <niklass@...s.com>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     Niklas Cassel <niklass@...s.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: endpoint: BAR width should not depend on sizeof dma_addr_t

If a BAR supports 64-bit width or not depends on the hardware,
and should thus not depend on sizeof(dma_addr_t).

Since this driver is generic, default to always using BAR width
of 32-bits. 64-bit BARs can easily be tested by replacing
PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32 with PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64
in bar_flags.

Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...s.com>
---
Note to Lorenzo/Bjorn:
It is not trivial to convert the bar_size + bar_flags +
struct pci_epf->bar member array to an array of struct resources,
since we need to be able to store the addresses returned
by dma_alloc_coherent(), which is of type dma_addr_t.
struct resource uses resource_size_t, which is defined as phys_addr_t.
E.g. ARTPEC-7 uses 64-bit dma_addr_t, but only 32-bit phys_addr_t.

 drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
index 800da09d9005..7c70433b11a7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
@@ -71,6 +71,14 @@ struct pci_epf_test_data {
 };
 
 static int bar_size[] = { 512, 512, 1024, 16384, 131072, 1048576 };
+static int bar_flags[] = {
+	PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY | PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32,
+	PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY | PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32,
+	PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY | PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32,
+	PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY | PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32,
+	PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY | PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32,
+	PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY | PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32
+};
 
 static int pci_epf_test_copy(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test)
 {
@@ -358,7 +366,6 @@ static void pci_epf_test_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
 
 static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
 {
-	int flags;
 	int bar;
 	int ret;
 	struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
@@ -367,15 +374,11 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
 	struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = epf_get_drvdata(epf);
 	enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = epf_test->test_reg_bar;
 
-	flags = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY | PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32;
-	if (sizeof(dma_addr_t) == 0x8)
-		flags |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64;
-
 	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) {
 		epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
 		ret = pci_epc_set_bar(epc, epf->func_no, bar,
 				      epf_bar->phys_addr,
-				      epf_bar->size, flags);
+				      epf_bar->size, bar_flags[bar]);
 		if (ret) {
 			pci_epf_free_space(epf, epf_test->reg[bar], bar);
 			dev_err(dev, "failed to set BAR%d\n", bar);
-- 
2.14.2