[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1520524591.2809.0.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:56:32 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tursulin@...ulin.net" <tursulin@...ulin.net>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com" <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>,
"hare@...e.com" <hare@...e.com>,
"jthumshirn@...e.de" <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
"target-devel@...r.kernel.org" <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"nab@...ux-iscsi.org" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] lib/scatterlist: Drop order argument from
sgl_free_n_order
On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 07:59 +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> However there is a different bug in my patch relating to the last entry
> which can have shorter length from the rest. So get_order on the last
> entry is incorrect - I have to store the deduced order and carry it over.
Will that work if there is only one entry in the list and if it is a short
entry?
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists