[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHQ1cqFBxkd3h4X9v5CQVv+Byz1qeSz5FmvjL42ARt1R2xvc1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 09:18:58 -0800
From: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: rave-sp: Add code to print firmware versions
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:51 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>
>> Add code that would query and print out bootloader and application
>> firmware version info.
>>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: cphealy@...il.com
>> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
>> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Lee:
>>
>> The reason 'part_number_firmware' and 'part_number_firmware' are a
>> part of struct rave_sp is because there exists another patch on top of
>> this one that exposes those fields via sysfs. The latter patch is not
>> currently being upstreamed (might be in the future), so if keeping
>> this arrangement is too ugly, let me know, and I'll get rid of those
>> fields in 'rave_sp'.
>
> That's okay.
>
>> drivers/mfd/rave-sp.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rave-sp.c b/drivers/mfd/rave-sp.c
>> index c8173de5653a..9e4c83ff2aec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/rave-sp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rave-sp.c
>> @@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ struct rave_sp_variant {
>> * @variant: Device variant specific information
>> * @event_notifier_list: Input event notification chain
>> *
>> + * @part_number_firmware: Firmware version
>> + * @part_number_bootloader: Bootloader version
>> */
>> struct rave_sp {
>> struct serdev_device *serdev;
>> @@ -171,8 +173,42 @@ struct rave_sp {
>>
>> const struct rave_sp_variant *variant;
>> struct blocking_notifier_head event_notifier_list;
>> +
>> + const char *part_number_firmware;
>> + const char *part_number_bootloader;
>> };
>>
>> +struct rave_sp_version {
>> + u8 hardware;
>> + __le16 major;
>> + u8 minor;
>> + u8 letter[2];
>> +} __packed;
>> +
>> +struct rave_sp_status {
>> + struct rave_sp_version bootloader_version;
>> + struct rave_sp_version firmware_version;
>> + u16 rdu_eeprom_flag;
>> + u16 dds_eeprom_flag;
>> + u8 pic_flag;
>> + u8 orientation;
>> + u32 etc;
>> + s16 temp[2];
>> + u8 backlight_current[3];
>> + u8 dip_switch;
>> + u8 host_interrupt;
>> + u16 voltage_28;
>> + u8 i2c_device_status;
>> + u8 power_status;
>> + u8 general_status;
>> +#define RAVE_SP_STATUS_GS_FIRMWARE_MODE BIT(1)
>
> I'm more concerned with the seemingly unused #define shoved in the
> middle of a struct definition -- which I am not a fan of.
>
> Better to introduce it when you start using it and outside of the
> struct definition please.
>
> The remainder of the patch looks okay.
OK, will fix in v2.
Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists