linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.15 000/122] 4.15.8-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180308172746.GD22996@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Mar 2018 09:27:46 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.15 000/122] 4.15.8-stable review

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 12:42:05PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 8 March 2018 at 01:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.8 release.
> > There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri Mar  9 19:16:43 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.15.8-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
> 
> NOTE:
> qemu_x86_64 LTP syscalls and fs tests failed (due to infrastructure issues) have
> been resubmitted and updated results summary.

Thanks for testing both of these and letting me know.

greg k-h