linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: exp: Protect all sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done() with rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180308173747.GO3918@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Mar 2018 09:37:47 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: exp: Protect all sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done()
 with rcu_node lock

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:48:27PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Currently some callsites of sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done() are not called
> with the corresponding rcu_node's ->lock held, which could introduces
> bugs as per Paul:
> 
> o	CPU 0 in sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done() reads ->exp_tasks and
> 	sees that it is NULL.
> 
> o	CPU 1 blocks within an RCU read-side critical section, so
> 	it enqueues the task and points ->exp_tasks at it and
> 	clears CPU 1's bit in ->expmask.
> 
> o	All other CPUs clear their bits in ->expmask.
> 
> o	CPU 0 reads ->expmask, sees that it is zero, so incorrectly
> 	concludes that all quiescent states have completed, despite
> 	the fact that ->exp_tasks is non-NULL.
> 
> To fix this, sync_rcu_preempt_exp_unlocked() is introduced to replace
> lockless callsites of sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done().
> 
> Further, a lockdep annotation is added into sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done()
> to prevent mis-use in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>

Again, good catch, applied for testing and review.  Thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
> v1 --> v2:
> 	Kill unnecessary blank lines
> 
> 
>  kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> index 2fd882b08b7c..3f30cc3b7669 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
>   * Authors: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>   */
> 
> +#include <linux/lockdep.h>
> +
>  /*
>   * Record the start of an expedited grace period.
>   */
> @@ -158,10 +160,30 @@ static void __maybe_unused sync_exp_reset_tree(struct rcu_state *rsp)
>   */
>  static bool sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(struct rcu_node *rnp)
>  {
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&rnp->lock);
> +
>  	return rnp->exp_tasks == NULL &&
>  	       READ_ONCE(rnp->expmask) == 0;
>  }
> 
> +/*
> + * Like sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(), but this function assumes the caller
> + * doesn't hold the rcu_node's ->lock, and will acquire and release the lock
> + * itself
> + */
> +static bool sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done_unlocked(struct rcu_node *rnp)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	bool ret;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
> +	ret = sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp);
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +
>  /*
>   * Report the exit from RCU read-side critical section for the last task
>   * that queued itself during or before the current expedited preemptible-RCU
> @@ -498,9 +520,9 @@ static void synchronize_sched_expedited_wait(struct rcu_state *rsp)
>  	for (;;) {
>  		ret = swait_event_timeout(
>  				rsp->expedited_wq,
> -				sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp_root),
> +				sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done_unlocked(rnp_root),
>  				jiffies_stall);
> -		if (ret > 0 || sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp_root))
> +		if (ret > 0 || sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done_unlocked(rnp_root))
>  			return;
>  		WARN_ON(ret < 0);  /* workqueues should not be signaled. */
>  		if (rcu_cpu_stall_suppress)
> @@ -533,7 +555,7 @@ static void synchronize_sched_expedited_wait(struct rcu_state *rsp)
>  			rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
>  				if (rnp == rnp_root)
>  					continue; /* printed unconditionally */
> -				if (sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp))
> +				if (sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done_unlocked(rnp))
>  					continue;
>  				pr_cont(" l=%u:%d-%d:%#lx/%c",
>  					rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
> -- 
> 2.16.2
>