[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1520531530.11634.18.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 09:52:10 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the rdma-fixes
tree
On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 10:44 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I only ask becuase I keep seeing these reports from Stephen and
> usuaully by the time it gets to him it requires a disruptive rebase to
> fix..
If it's a part of a series, it will always require a rebase.
Generally, I think it's a small and relatively unlikely
problem for checkpatch to bother with as there's already
a reporting mechanism in-place.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists