[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3403715.fyf8cBQUvz@phil>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 23:44:38 +0100
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Cc: architt@...eaurora.org, inki.dae@...sung.com,
thierry.reding@...il.com, hjc@...k-chips.com,
seanpaul@...omium.org, airlied@...ux.ie, tfiga@...omium.org,
hshi@...omium.org, wzz@...k-chips.com, hl@...k-chips.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dianders@...omium.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
orjan.eide@....com, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/38] drm/rockchip: Don't use atomic constructs for psr
Am Montag, 5. März 2018, 23:22:54 CET schrieb Enric Balletbo i Serra:
> From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
>
> Instead of using timer and spinlocks, use delayed_work and
> mutexes for rockchip psr. This allows us to make blocking
> calls when enabling/disabling psr (which is sort of important
> given we're talking over dpcd to the display).
>
> Cc: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>
> Cc: 征增 王 <wzz@...k-chips.com>
> Cc: Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@...labora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
applied to drm-misc-next after
checking on both pinky (rk3288) and kevin (rk3399).
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists