linux-kernel - [PATCH V3 4/4] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180308105358.1506-5-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu,  8 Mar 2018 18:53:58 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 4/4] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as possible

84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs")
may cause irq vector assigned to all offline CPUs, and this kind of
assignment may cause much less irq vectors mapped to online CPUs, and
performance may get hurt.

For example, in a 8 cores system, 0~3 online, 4~8 offline/not present,
see 'lscpu':

	[ming@box]$lscpu
	Architecture:          x86_64
	CPU op-mode(s):        32-bit, 64-bit
	Byte Order:            Little Endian
	CPU(s):                4
	On-line CPU(s) list:   0-3
	Thread(s) per core:    1
	Core(s) per socket:    2
	Socket(s):             2
	NUMA node(s):          2
	...
	NUMA node0 CPU(s):     0-3
	NUMA node1 CPU(s):
	...

For example, one device has 4 queues:

1) before 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs")
	irq 39, cpu list 0
	irq 40, cpu list 1
	irq 41, cpu list 2
	irq 42, cpu list 3

2) after 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs")
	irq 39, cpu list 0-2
	irq 40, cpu list 3-4,6
	irq 41, cpu list 5
	irq 42, cpu list 7

3) after applying this patch against V4.15+:
	irq 39, cpu list 0,4
	irq 40, cpu list 1,6
	irq 41, cpu list 2,5
	irq 42, cpu list 3,7

This patch tries to do irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as
possible by 2 stages spread.

The above assignment 3) isn't the optimal result from NUMA view, but it
returns more irq vectors with online CPU mapped, given in reality one CPU
should be enough to handle one irq vector, so it is better to do this way.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reported-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/irq/affinity.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
index 616f040c5d02..253c5bf85d18 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
@@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ static int irq_build_affinity_masks(const struct irq_affinity *affd,
 	nodemask_t nodemsk = NODE_MASK_NONE;
 	int n, nodes, cpus_per_vec, extra_vecs, done = 0;
 
+	if (!cpumask_weight(cpu_mask))
+		return 0;
+
 	nodes = get_nodes_in_cpumask(node_to_cpumask, cpu_mask, &nodemsk);
 
 	/*
@@ -175,9 +178,9 @@ struct cpumask *
 irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
 {
 	int affv = nvecs - affd->pre_vectors - affd->post_vectors;
-	int curvec;
+	int curvec, vecs_offline, vecs_online;
 	struct cpumask *masks;
-	cpumask_var_t nmsk, *node_to_cpumask;
+	cpumask_var_t nmsk, cpu_mask, *node_to_cpumask;
 
 	/*
 	 * If there aren't any vectors left after applying the pre/post
@@ -193,9 +196,12 @@ irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
 	if (!masks)
 		goto out;
 
+	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_mask, GFP_KERNEL))
+		goto out;
+
 	node_to_cpumask = alloc_node_to_cpumask();
 	if (!node_to_cpumask)
-		goto out;
+		goto out_free_cpu_mask;
 
 	/* Fill out vectors at the beginning that don't need affinity */
 	for (curvec = 0; curvec < affd->pre_vectors; curvec++)
@@ -204,15 +210,32 @@ irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
 	/* Stabilize the cpumasks */
 	get_online_cpus();
 	build_node_to_cpumask(node_to_cpumask);
-	curvec += irq_build_affinity_masks(affd, curvec, affv,
-					   node_to_cpumask,
-					   cpu_possible_mask, nmsk, masks);
+	/* spread on online CPUs starting from the vector of affd->pre_vectors */
+	vecs_online = irq_build_affinity_masks(affd, curvec, affv,
+					       node_to_cpumask,
+					       cpu_online_mask, nmsk, masks);
+
+	/* spread on offline CPUs starting from the next vector to be handled */
+	if (vecs_online >= affv)
+		curvec = affd->pre_vectors;
+	else
+		curvec = affd->pre_vectors + vecs_online;
+	cpumask_andnot(cpu_mask, cpu_possible_mask, cpu_online_mask);
+	vecs_offline = irq_build_affinity_masks(affd, curvec, affv,
+						node_to_cpumask,
+					        cpu_mask, nmsk, masks);
 	put_online_cpus();
 
 	/* Fill out vectors at the end that don't need affinity */
+	if (vecs_online + vecs_offline >= affv)
+		curvec = affv + affd->pre_vectors;
+	else
+		curvec = affd->pre_vectors + vecs_online + vecs_offline;
 	for (; curvec < nvecs; curvec++)
 		cpumask_copy(masks + curvec, irq_default_affinity);
 	free_node_to_cpumask(node_to_cpumask);
+out_free_cpu_mask:
+	free_cpumask_var(cpu_mask);
 out:
 	free_cpumask_var(nmsk);
 	return masks;
-- 
2.9.5