linux-kernel - [PATCH] perf annotate: Handle s390 pc relative load and store instruction.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180308120913.14802-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu,  8 Mar 2018 13:09:13 +0100
From:   Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        acme@...nel.org
Cc:     brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
        Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf annotate: Handle s390 pc relative load and store instruction.

S390 has several load and store instructions with target operand
addressing relative to the program counter, for example lrl, lgrl,
strl, stgrl.

These instructions are handled similar to x86. Objdump output
displays those instructions as:
   9595c: c4 2d 00 09 9c 54   lgrl   %r7,1c8540 <mp_+0x60>
This output is parsed (like on x86) and perf annotate shows those
lines as:
   lgrl   %r7,mp_+0x60

This patch handles the s390 specific instruction parsing for
pc relative load and store instructions.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 tools/perf/arch/s390/annotate/instructions.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/s390/annotate/instructions.c b/tools/perf/arch/s390/annotate/instructions.c
index 0a3e39b5143d..0c54f1b33ac0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/s390/annotate/instructions.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/s390/annotate/instructions.c
@@ -52,6 +52,61 @@ static struct ins_ops s390_call_ops = {
 	.scnprintf = call__scnprintf,
 };
 
+static int s390_mov__parse(struct arch *arch __maybe_unused,
+			   struct ins_operands *ops,
+			   struct map *map __maybe_unused)
+{
+	char *s = strchr(ops->raw, ','), *target, *endptr;
+
+	if (s == NULL)
+		return -1;
+
+	*s = '\0';
+	ops->source.raw = strdup(ops->raw);
+	*s = ',';
+
+	if (ops->source.raw == NULL)
+		return -1;
+
+	target = ++s;
+	ops->target.raw = strdup(target);
+	if (ops->target.raw == NULL)
+		goto out_free_source;
+
+	ops->target.addr = strtoull(target, &endptr, 16);
+	if (endptr == target)
+		goto out_free_target;
+
+	s = strchr(endptr, '<');
+	if (s == NULL)
+		goto out_free_target;
+	endptr = strchr(s + 1, '>');
+	if (endptr == NULL)
+		goto out_free_target;
+
+	*endptr = '\0';
+	ops->target.name = strdup(s + 1);
+	*endptr = '>';
+	if (ops->target.name == NULL)
+		goto out_free_target;
+
+	return 0;
+
+out_free_target:
+	zfree(&ops->target.raw);
+out_free_source:
+	zfree(&ops->source.raw);
+	return -1;
+}
+
+static int mov__scnprintf(struct ins *ins, char *bf, size_t size,
+			  struct ins_operands *ops);
+
+static struct ins_ops s390_mov_ops = {
+	.parse	   = s390_mov__parse,
+	.scnprintf = mov__scnprintf,
+};
+
 static struct ins_ops *s390__associate_ins_ops(struct arch *arch, const char *name)
 {
 	struct ins_ops *ops = NULL;
@@ -68,6 +123,14 @@ static struct ins_ops *s390__associate_ins_ops(struct arch *arch, const char *na
 		ops = &s390_call_ops;
 	if (!strcmp(name, "br"))
 		ops = &ret_ops;
+	/* override load/store relative to PC */
+	if (!strcmp(name, "lrl") ||
+	    !strcmp(name, "lgrl") ||
+	    !strcmp(name, "lgfrl") ||
+	    !strcmp(name, "llgfrl") ||
+	    !strcmp(name, "strl") ||
+	    !strcmp(name, "stgrl"))
+		ops = &s390_mov_ops;
 
 	if (ops)
 		arch__associate_ins_ops(arch, name, ops);
-- 
2.14.3