[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMz4kuKcLif02j6VwfAgQ1=4orhydboj9yXgvau=KQofkuosLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:47:22 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/3] rtc: Use time64_t to save range_max of RTC
Hi Alexandre,
On 8 March 2018 at 06:54, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26/02/2018 at 16:33:56 +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> We need use rtc->range_max to valid if the time values are valid,
>> and the time values are saved by time64_t type. So change the
>> rtc->range_max to time64_t type for comparison correctly.
>>
>
> I'm not applying this one because the described issue will never happen
> as negative times are forbidden by the rtc subsystem.
OK.
>
> I've applied the two following patches
>
Thanks.
--
Baolin.wang
Best Regards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists