linux-kernel - Re: Make set_handle_irq and handle_arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1803092358120.1570@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Sat, 10 Mar 2018 00:00:56 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
cc:     linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, jonas@...thpole.se,
        stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi, shorne@...il.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        openrisc@...ts.librecores.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Make set_handle_irq and handle_arch_irq generic, v3

On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 02:20:12 PST (-0800), tglx@...utronix.de wrote:
> > This looks sensible. We have two options for getting this merged:
> > 
> > 1)   I'll take the whole lot through tip/irq/core
> > 
> > 2)   I'll apply patch 1/N to a special branch in tip. That branch will
> > contain
> >      only this commit on top of 4.16-rc4 and can be pulled by the relevant
> >      architecture maintainers, so they can apply their architecture specific
> >      patches.
> 
> Option 1 seems like the lowest overhead, as that way we don't need to sequence
> the patches between multiple trees.  If all the other arch maintianers are OK
> with it then that works for me.

Ok, I wait for someone to yell NO until tuesday. If that doesn't happen I
pick it up.

> The 0-day robot found a new build warning on openrisc.  I was plannning
> on submitting a v4 with this fix in it
>
>    diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
> b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
>    index d9eee0a2b7b4..eb612b1865d2 100644
>    --- a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
>    +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
>    @@ -24,6 +24,4 @@
>        #define NO_IRQ         (-1)
>       -extern void set_handle_irq(void (*handle_irq)(struct pt_regs *));
>    -
>     #endif /* __ASM_OPENRISC_IRQ_H__ */
> 
> I can submit a v4, or you can just grab it from

Just reply on the v3 openrisc patch with a v4 and I grab it from there.

Thanks,

	tglx