[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180309230346.7mphnvsdxugpmtmc@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 17:03:46 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: frowand.list@...il.com
Cc: cpandya@...eaurora.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] of: cache phandle nodes to reduce cost of
of_find_node_by_phandle()
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 04:14:47PM -0800, frowand.list@...il.com wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
>
> Create a cache of the nodes that contain a phandle property. Use this
> cache to find the node for a given phandle value instead of scanning
> the devicetree to find the node. If the phandle value is not found
> in the cache, of_find_node_by_phandle() will fall back to the tree
> scan algorithm.
>
> The cache is initialized in of_core_init().
>
> The cache is freed via a late_initcall_sync() if modules are not
> enabled.
>
> If the devicetree is created by the dtc compiler, with all phandle
> property values auto generated, then the size required by the cache
> could be 4 * (1 + number of phandles) bytes. This results in an O(1)
> node lookup cost for a given phandle value. Due to a concern that the
> phandle property values might not be consistent with what is generated
> by the dtc compiler, a mask has been added to the cache lookup algorithm.
> To maintain the O(1) node lookup cost, the size of the cache has been
> increased by rounding the number of entries up to the next power of
> two.
>
> The overhead of finding the devicetree node containing a given phandle
> value has been noted by several people in the recent past, in some cases
> with a patch to add a hashed index of devicetree nodes, based on the
> phandle value of the node. One concern with this approach is the extra
> space added to each node. This patch takes advantage of the phandle
> property values auto generated by the dtc compiler, which begin with
> one and monotonically increase by one, resulting in a range of 1..n
> for n phandle values. This implementation should also provide a good
> reduction of overhead for any range of phandle values that are mostly
> in a monotonic range.
>
> Performance measurements by Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>
> of several implementations of patches that are similar to this one
> suggest an expected reduction of boot time by ~400ms for his test
> system. If the cache size was decreased to 64 entries, the boot
> time was reduced by ~340 ms. The measurements were on a 4.9.73 kernel
> for arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sda670-mtp.dts, contains 2371 nodes and
> 814 phandle values.
>
> Reported-by: Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
> ---
I've applied this one, but not the others.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists