[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ec9338e-1522-2b6a-99c2-ffe70b7a06a9@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 14:22:09 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid selinux denial on CAP_SYS_RESOURCE
On 2018/3/9 12:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This fixes CAP_SYS_RESOURCE denial of selinux when using resgid.
A little confusion, if capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) is false, we still have chance
to return true for below resuid & resgid cases, right?
Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index f6dc70666ebb..3d12277fbe9e 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1607,13 +1607,13 @@ static inline bool __allow_reserved_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> return false;
> if (IS_NOQUOTA(inode))
> return true;
> - if (capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
> - return true;
> if (uid_eq(sbi->s_resuid, current_fsuid()))
> return true;
> if (!gid_eq(sbi->s_resgid, GLOBAL_ROOT_GID) &&
> in_group_p(sbi->s_resgid))
> return true;
> + if (capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
> + return true;
> return false;
> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists