[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180309073319.GB25709@ming.t460p>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 15:33:21 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online
CPUs as far as possible
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:00:08AM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 09:24 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 12:20:09AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > Actually, it isn't a real fix, the real one is in the following
> > > > two:
> > > >
> > > > 0c20244d458e scsi: megaraid_sas: fix selection of reply queue
> > > > ed6d043be8cd scsi: hpsa: fix selection of reply queue
> > >
> > > Where are these commits? Neither Linus tree not -next know anything
> > > about
> > > them....
> >
> > Both aren't merged yet, but they should land V4.16, IMO.
>
> Is it a secret where they are? If not, could you please give ma a
> pointer and I'll give them a test.
https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=152056636717380&w=2
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists