[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35c68f2a-8198-7db6-c381-420ac996802a@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 09:59:28 +0800
From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, keith.busch@...el.com,
axboe@...com, hch@....de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/5] nvme: add helper interface to flush in-flight
requests
Hi Sagi
Thanks for your precious time for review and comment.
On 03/09/2018 02:21 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_abort_requests_sync);
>> +
>> +static void nvme_comp_req(struct request *req, void *data, bool reserved)
>
> Not a very good name...
Yes, indeed.
>
>> +{
>> + struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = (struct nvme_ctrl *)data;
>> +
>> + if (!test_bit(NVME_REQ_ABORTED, &nvme_req(req)->flags))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + WARN_ON(!blk_mq_request_started(req));
>> +
>> + if (ctrl->tagset && ctrl->tagset->ops->complete) {
>
> What happens when this called on the admin tagset when the controller
> does not have an io tagset?
Yes, nvme_ctrl.admin_tagset should be used here for adminq request.
>
>> + clear_bit(NVME_REQ_ABORTED, &nvme_req(req)->flags);
>> + /*
>> + * We set the status to NVME_SC_ABORT_REQ, then ioq request
>> + * will be requeued and adminq one will be failed.
>> + */
>> + nvme_req(req)->status = NVME_SC_ABORT_REQ;
>> + /*
>> + * For ioq request, blk_mq_requeue_request should be better
>> + * here. But the nvme code will still setup the cmd even if
>> + * the RQF_DONTPREP is set. We have to use .complete to free
>> + * the cmd and then requeue it.
>
> IMO, its better to fix nvme to not setup the command if RQF_DONTPREP is on (other than the things it must setup).
Yes, I used to consider change that.
But I'm not sure whether there is special consideration there.
If you and Keith think it is ok that not setup command when RQF_DONTPREP is set, we could do that.
>
>> + *
>> + * For adminq request, invoking .complete directly will miss
>> + * blk_mq_sched_completed_request, but this is ok because we
>> + * won't have io scheduler for adminq.
>> + */
>> + ctrl->tagset->ops->complete(req);
>
> I don't think that directly calling .complete is a good idea...
Yes, indeed.
Thanks a lot
Jianchao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists