[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1520608760.4638.14.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:19:20 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Ilsche <thomas.ilsche@...dresden.de>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v3 0/6] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework
On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 10:34 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks a lot for the discussion and testing so far!
>
> This is a total respin of the whole series, so please look at it
> afresh.
> Patches 2 and 3 are the most similar to their previous versions, but
> still they are different enough.
This series gives no RCU errors on startup,
and no CPUs seem to be getting stuck any more.
I will run some performance tests with these
patches.
--
All Rights Reversed.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists