lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1520561275.1367.10.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Mar 2018 02:07:56 +0000
From:   "Zhang, Ning A" <ning.a.zhang@...el.com>
To:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@...el.com>
Subject: Re: maybe a bug in SELinux: security_context_to_sid_core

Hi, Bill

For below SELinux behavior, do you know why.

BR.
Ning.


在 2018-02-28三的 14:47 +0800,Zhang Ning写道:
> Hi,
> 
> Before SELinux is initialized, get scontext by secid by using:
> 
> security_secctx_to_secid() may return wrong numbe
> 
> eg:
> security_secctx_to_secid("devnull", strlen("devnull"), &sid);
> 
> sid here will be 1
> 
> because:
> 
> in security_context_to_sid_core:
> 
> ...
> 	if (!ss_initialized) {
> 		int i;
> 
> 		for (i = 1; i < SECINITSID_NUM; i++) {
> 			if (!strcmp(initial_sid_to_string[i],
> scontext)) {
> 				*sid = i;
> 				return 0;
> 			}
> 		}
> 		*sid = SECINITSID_KERNEL;
> 		return 0;
> 	}
> ...
> 
> and SECINITSID_DEVNULL equals to SECINITSID_NUM, and it will never get
> right secid for "devnull".
> 
> is this by design or bug?
> 
> BR.
> Ning.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ