linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] of: unittest: remove unneeded local return value variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7f0ab50a-8a57-799d-e620-4e7f4fdf039d@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Mar 2018 17:28:12 -0800
From:   Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] of: unittest: remove unneeded local return value
 variables

On 03/09/18 16:02, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:39:04PM -0800, frowand.list@...il.com wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
>>
>> A common pattern in many unittest functions is to save the return
>> value of a function in a local variable, then test the value of
>> the local variable, without using that return value for any further
>> purpose.  Remove the local return value variable for these cases.
>>
>> A second common pattern is:
>>
>>    ret = some_test_function(many, parameters, ...);
>>    if (unittest(ret == 0, "error message format", ...))
>>       return;
>>
>> This pattern is more clear when the local variable 'ret' is used, due
>> to the long lines caused by the parameters to the test function and
>> the long format and data parameters of unittest().  The local
>> variable is retained in these cases.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/of/unittest.c | 89 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> 
> Doesn't apply. What's it based on?
> 
> Rob
> 

Sorry, I guess I should have mentioned that.

Based on top of of_overlay_fdt_apply() v7 for 4.17.

It applies with or without Dan's "[PATCH] of: unittest: fix
an error test in of_unittest_overlay_8()", which made me notice
the common pattern.

-Frank