[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180310081123.thin6wphgk7tongy@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 09:11:23 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] y2038: time: Introduce struct __kernel_old_timeval
> +extern struct __kernel_old_timeval ns_to_kernel_old_timeval(const s64 nsec);
Generally there's no need to mark arguments with arithmethic types as const, as
they are never modified in the calling scope.
> + * legacy timeval structure, only embedded in structures that
> + * traditionally used 'timeval' to pass time intervals (not absolute
> + * times). Do not add new users. If user space fails to compile
> + * here, this is probably because it is not y2038 safe and needs to
> + * be changed to use another interface.
> + */
> +struct __kernel_old_timeval {
> + __kernel_long_t tv_sec; /* seconds */
> + __kernel_long_t tv_usec; /* seconds */
s/seconds/microseconds
> +struct __kernel_old_timeval ns_to_kernel_old_timeval(const s64 nsec)
> +{
> + struct timespec64 ts = ns_to_timespec64(nsec);
> + struct __kernel_old_timeval tv;
> +
> + tv.tv_sec = ts.tv_sec;
> + tv.tv_usec = (suseconds_t) ts.tv_nsec / 1000;
Is ts.tv_nsec guaranteed to never have bits set in the high 32 bits?
In any case, the space before the type cast is a bit confusing to me, I think it
should be written as:
tv.tv_usec = (suseconds_t)ts.tv_nsec / 1000;
To better show was the higher precedence of the cast is going to result in.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists