[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d00187b102355c74b5efc2f7923c441785a6390c.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 13:21:16 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5 V2] tpm2: add longer timeouts for creation commands.
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 15:19 +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 11:25 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > TPM2_CC_Create(0x153) and TPM2_CC_CreatePrimary (0x131) involve
> > > generation of crypto keys which can be a computationally intensive task.
> > > The timeout is set to 3min.
> > > Rather than increasing default timeout a new constant is added, to not
> > > stall for too long on regular commands failures.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> >
> > Why are you radically chaging the default timeout? The commit message
> > does not tell anything about that change.
> >
>
> Let me, recheck but it should be same value just converted to msecs.
>
> > Why couldn't we just have two timeouts: one default and one long that
> > would be at least as long as the longest timeout defined in the spec?
>
> I've tried to explain it in the commit message but apparently has failed.
>
> We have a default or undefined which should be the same as it was unless I did
> some silly mistake in conversion to msecs (will check), ass all others are in
> msecs.
> It was 2 min = 2 * 60 * HZ (in jiffies) which would be msecs_to_jiffies(2 * 60
> * 1000 = 120000)
> TPM2_DURATION_DEFAULT = 120000
Aah, of course :-) The problem was that I had somehow a blid spot with
seeing the msec_to_jiffies() conversion.
TPM_NUM_DURATIONS would a better name than TPM_DURATION_MAX because
TPM_DURATION_MAX is easy to confuse with TPM_DURATION_* constants.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists