linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] Move most GPIO documentation to driver-api/gpio/ and ReST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkda=5i-j=W8+yosF9WiZRKFF=iRC-djja7MJE+k6b1xtaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 10 Mar 2018 12:50:46 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Move most GPIO documentation to driver-api/gpio/ and ReST

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Jonathan Neuschäfer
<j.neuschaefer@....net> wrote:

> The aim of this patchset is to move the GPIO subsystem's documentation
> under Documentation/driver-api/gpio/ such that it is picked up by Sphinx
> and compiled into HTML.

Awesome!

> I moved everything except for sysfs.txt, because
> this file describes the legacy sysfs ABI, and doesn't seem to serve much
> (non-historical) purpose anymore.
>
> There are still some rough edges:
>
> * I think the API documentation (kernel-doc) should be moved out of
>   index.rst into more appropriate files.
> * The headings are arguably wrong, because driver.rst, consumer.rst,
>   etc. use the "document title" style, even though they are part of the
>   GPIO chapter. But the resulting TOC tree is consistent, and I did not
>   want to change almost all headings.
> * Some of the files could use more :c:func:`...` references and general
>   ReST polish.
>
> But I don't want to make this patchset too large.

It's fine, we take it one step at a time.

On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:41:20AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:

> Anyway, I'm happy to take these through the docs tree or see them go via
> GPIO; Linus, what's your preference?

I might have some doc patches that could collide so I can take them.

I take it there will be a v2?

Yours,
Linus Walleij