[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4iZFW9Lk=KdEy=0iYzM9GmQ4ccoN2imYNDq6XwXDgXsDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 09:40:03 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] xfs, dax: introduce xfs_dax_aops
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 1:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>> +int dax_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * Unlike __set_page_dirty_no_writeback that handles dirty page
>> + * tracking in the page object, dax does all dirty tracking in
>> + * the inode address_space in response to mkwrite faults. In the
>> + * dax case we only need to worry about potentially dirty CPU
>> + * caches, not dirty page cache pages to write back.
>> + *
>> + * This callback is defined to prevent fallback to
>> + * __set_page_dirty_buffers() in set_page_dirty().
>> + */
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> Make this a generic noop_set_page_dirty maybe?
>
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_set_page_dirty);
>> +
>> +void dax_invalidatepage(struct page *page, unsigned int offset,
>> + unsigned int length)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * There is no page cache to invalidate in the dax case, however
>> + * we need this callback defined to prevent falling back to
>> + * block_invalidatepage() in do_invalidatepage().
>> + */
>> +}
>
> Same here.
I guess I'm not sure what you mean. These nops are specific to dax I
don't think they make sense in another context besides dax.
>
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_invalidatepage);
>
> And EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for anything dax-related, please.
>
>> +const struct address_space_operations xfs_dax_aops = {
>> + .writepages = xfs_vm_writepages,
>
> Please split out the DAX case from xfs_vm_writepages.
Will do.
> This patch should probably also split into VFS and XFS parts.
Ok.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists