linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] leds: fix wrong dmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b51f1f41-e06e-25e6-30f8-a2b9f7e8ffb8@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 10 Mar 2018 22:13:55 +0100
From:   Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
To:     Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>,
        Alan Mizrahi <alan@...rahi.com.ve>,
        Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" 
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: fix wrong dmi_match on PC Engines APU LEDs

Hi Hans,

Thank you for the patch.

On 03/05/2018 06:09 PM, Hans Ulli Kroll wrote:
> APU has compared to APU2 no DMI_BOARD_NAME.
> Use DMI_PRODUCT_NAME instead.

Could we have the commit message more expressive?

Is it that now this driver doesn't work for APU board?

> Signed-off-by: Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/leds/leds-apu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-apu.c b/drivers/leds/leds-apu.c
> index 74820aab9497..5bbf5c31413e 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-apu.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-apu.c
> @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static int __init apu_led_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	apu_led->pdev = pdev;
>  
> -	if (dmi_match(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "APU")) {
> +	if (dmi_match(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "APU")) {
>  		apu_led->profile = apu1_led_profile;
>  		apu_led->platform = APU1_LED_PLATFORM;
>  		apu_led->num_led_instances = ARRAY_SIZE(apu1_led_profile);
> 

If it fails here, then how it is possible that it succeeds
in the apu_led_init() ?

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski