[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180311192322.101598-1-jelsasser@appneta.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 12:22:54 -0700
From: Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@...neta.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@...neta.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Myungho Jung <mhjungk@...il.com>,
Michal Kubeček <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] net: avoid a kernel panic during sk_busy_loop
Hi Dave,
I stumbled across a reproducible kernel panic while playing around with
busy_poll on a Linux 4.9.86 kernel. There's an unfortunate interaction
between init_dummy_netdev, which doesn't bother to fill in netdev_ops, and
sk_busy_loop, which assumes netdev_ops is a valid pointer.
To reproduce on the device under test (DUT), I did:
$ ip addr show dev wlan0
8: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq [...]
inet 172.16.122.6/23 brd 172.16.123.255 scope global wlan0
$ sysctl -w net.core.busy_read=50
$ nc -l 172.16.122.6 5001
Then transmitted some data to this socket from a second host:
$ echo "foo" | nc 172.16.122.6 5001
The DUT immediately hits a kernel panic.
I've attached a patch that applies cleanly to the 4.9.87 stable release.
This fix isn't necessary for net/net-next (ndo_busy_poll was removed in
linux-4.11), but a further backport of this commit is likely required for
any stable releases older than linux-4.5.
I hope this is the right way to raise something like this. I couldn't find
a clear answer from the -stable and netdev howtos for bugs against features
that no longer exist in mainline.
Thanks,
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists